SHIPPED

WEBSITE REDESIGN

B2B + B2C

✦ Redesigning a support network for community homelessness.

Led a redesign of ECHO's website to better serve community experiencing homelessness in Austin, Texas. Focused on enhancing the experience for service providers, policy makers, and created a unifying design system.

ROLE

Product designer

TOOLS

Figma

User Testing

Notion

TIMELINE

May - Aug 2026

(15 weeks)

TEAM

1 PM

1 TPM

3 product designers

3 engineers

1 stakeholder

Overview

ECHO supports 16,000+ people experiencing homelessness across Austin and Travis County—but its website serves people in crisis, service providers managing referrals, and policymakers /donors pulling reports—all with the same generic structure.

Through Develop for Good's Summer 2026 program, I joined a team of 3 designers and 3 engineers to redesign it from the ground up, working directly with a real ECHO stakeholder over 15 weeks.

I got the opportunity to work closely with a real stakeholder, alongside several engineers, designers, and managers, in order to put together a complete website overhaul in just four months.

SNEAK PEEK

Enhancing the experience for service providers & policymakers—all under one design system

As a product designer, I owned the experiences for service providers and policymakers and their respective journeys for finding information related to homelessness. I identified each user's needs and explored how they could be unified by one design system.

CONTEXT

ECHO leads homelessness response efforts across the Austin & Travis counties in Texas

ECHO (Ending Community Homelessness Coalition) leads the Homelessness Response System (HRS) for Austin and Travis County, serving 16,000+ people through a network centered on racial equity and led by people with lived experience of homelessness.

"ECHO is committed to ensuring housing is a human right for everyone who lives in our community."

Their site has to serve four fundamentally different people: someone in housing crisis, a caseworker managing a caseload, a policymaker on deadline, a first-time community donor.

Until this redesign, all four navigated the exact same structure. That mismatch was the root of almost every problem we found in research.

PROJECT CONSTRAINTS

From research to handoff

15-week project timeline.

We had 15 weeks to redesign ECHO's site end to end—which was simply not enough time to redesign everything.

So early on, we scoped two features out as stretch goals rather than commitments:

Data dashboard revamp

This required a custom code solution; so we preserved it as a separate entity linked from the main site rather than rebuilding it from scratch.

Fluent Spanish translation

Noone on the team was fluent, so Google Translate would be used and proofread by a Spanish speaker on ECHO's team post-launch.

Naming these tradeoffs early let us focus our four months on the parts of the site with the most user impact: navigation, information architecture, and the persona-specific journeys.

USER RESEARCH

Empathizing with real user needs

Before redesigning anything, we surveyed 21 site visitors to find out where the pain points were in the current site.

72.7% were able to find what they needed, but 2.1/4 was the average score for ease of use.

Navigation confusion, missing resources, and unclear info tied at 27% each for the reasons users struggled.

58.8% came to the website because they were experiencing homelessness (the majority user base).

That gap between "found it" and "found it easily" pointed to three insights that shaped every decision after:

People succeeded despite the site, not because of it.

A high completion rate paired with a low ease score meant users were working around the design, not through it.

Most visitors are in crisis, not browsing.

The site needed to prioritize speed to answer over depth of information—especially for the majority-share user experiencing homelessness.

Navigation was equally responsible for drop-off as content gaps.

We couldn't jump into fixing the current information architecture without examining the navigation bar as well.

USER PERSONAS

Four distinct users across one website

Rather than designing for a general audience, we grounded every decision into four main personas, which ended up defining the primary website navigation.

Persona 1: Person experiencing homelessness

Persona 2: Service provider

Persona 3: Policymaker/donor

Persona 4: Community member

PROBLEM

How might we design and develop an overhauled website that gives people experiencing homelessness, policymakers, service providers, and community members the information and resources they each need—so ECHO becomes the go-to source for homelessness information in Austin?

DESIGN CHALLENGE

The core navigation experience

One of the challenges we encountered was how to set up the main navigation bar. We decided between two different options:

Traditional navbar

Closer to ECHO's existing site: a standard About page with resource tabs.

Persona-based navbar

Each tab is assigned to a persona, allowing users to self-select their journey from the top of the page.

The two navigation bar options; arrows display how each option is connected.

Neither option alone was right.

The traditional navbar was familiar but didn't solve the core problem—users still had to guess which tab held what they needed.

The persona-based navbar solved that, but risked disorienting returning users and staff who already knew the old structure.

The hybrid approach

We landed on a hybrid approach: persona-informed tabs with rewritten, more intuitive verbiage, layered onto a structure that preserved enough of the original site's logic for existing users.

This wasn't just a stakeholder preference—it also held up in usability testing (see below), where task success and click-efficiency both improved under the hybrid structure compared to early dropdown-based prototypes.

High-fidelity navigation bar.

Users can also self-select their path directly from persona cards on the homepage, giving two entry points into the same underlying structure.

Low-fidelity home page.

DESIGN CHALLENGE

Nested dropdowns vs. landing pages

The bigger information architecture question: should each nav tab open a dropdown menu, or lead to its own landing page?

(1) Nested dropdown approach; (2) landing page approach.

Rather than assume, we tested both directions directly with users.

USER TESTING

7 participants, 4 tasks, & 1 scenario per persona

Our testing setup: 7 participants on UserTesting, each given one task tied to their assigned persona — a first-time visitor, a service provider, a policymaker, and a community member.

Three of the four tasks were successful—but policymakers trying to find homelessness data succeeded less than half the time, and took almost twice as many clicks as any other task.

One user said that the data tab felt "hidden amongst everything else."

This settled the navigation issue and pushed us to pivot towards landing pages instead of dropdowns.

ITERATIONS: BEFORE & AFTER

Stakeholder feedback & key improvements

Four rounds of stakeholder and user-testing feedback drove the biggest changes to the design, roughly in order of impact:

01. Navigation structure

Before • Dropdown menus buried resources under hover states.

After • Dedicated landing pages for each tab, directly responding to 43% policymaker success rate above.

02. Highlighting the homelesness dashboard

Before • Homelessness dashboard hidden as a normal tab.

After • At the stakeholder's request, we elevated it into the page header, making ECHO's most requested resource the most visible.

03. The first impression

Before • The homepage gave no sense of ECHO's impact or mission at a glance.

After • We added prominent impact statistics, current initiatives, and persona pathway cards, so a first-time visitor understands what ECHO does within seconds of landing.

04. Aligning with internal vocabulary

Before • Section titles used outdated, internal-facing terminology

After • We rewrote labels to match the language service providers actually search for.

By incorporating feedback from both the stakeholder and user testing, we were able to put together a cohesive website redesign of ECHO's website.

FINAL SOLUTION

✦ Unifying access to homelessness resources in Austin

Before

  • Ambiguous categories with confusing navigation

  • Critical information buried under dropdowns, requiring excessive clicks

  • Inconsistent formatting that felt clunky and unpolished

After

  • Streamlined landing pages built on a clearer information architecture

  • Condensed content with clear, intuitive affordances

  • One unified design system across every persona journey

All pages are unified under one clean, cohesive design system—adaptable and accommodating of dense information:

Explore ECHO's enhanced component set!

FINAL SOLUTION

✦ A home page designed to build trust

  • Persona pathway cards let users self-select their journey immediately

  • Client impact statistics establish credibility from the first scroll

  • Current initiatives keep the homepage dynamic rather than static

FINAL SOLUTION

✦ For service providers: resources, documents, and information to support clients

  • Section labels now mirror the exact language service providers search for

  • Expanded the scope to cover resource gaps surfaced during research—directly responding to what staff told us they couldn't find under the old structure

FINAL SOLUTION

✦ For policymakers: relevant data and research, front and center

  • Distinct, color-coded interactive cards organize different resource types

  • The homelessness dashboard—the resource that failed 43% of users in testing—is now a headline element instead of a buried tab

DESIGN CRITIQUE

Insight from industry professionals

We presented our project to professionals from Bloomberg and UserTesting, who provided us feedback on our overall approach, impact, and teamwork.

What we did well

  • Clearly communicated solution, decisions, and project timeline

  • Well-coordinated, well-paced presentation with a clear problem statement

  • Handled follow-up questions thoughtfully

What we can improve

  • Distribute work more evenly across the team

  • Share more personal perspective on what we found interesting or learned

Our team scored an average of 9.34/10!

IMPACT

The results of a 15-week project…

21 users surveyed to examine pain points with original website.

12 responsive, high-fidelity screens designed end-to-end.

Designs validated with 7 in-depth usability tests.

Dev-ready design to be shipped in WordPress & impact 16,000+ people.

REFLECTION

What I learned working under real constraints

Working with ECHO gave me valuable experience in working with an actual stakeholder, as well as utilizing user testing and determining what our product's priorities were when examined under genuine stakes.

Communicating with a non-technical stakeholder.

Prioritizing product needs with real stakes.

Leveraging user testing and stakeholder feedback.

My certificate & (some of) my lovely team! :)

Next project? ◡̈

Next project? ◡̈